When Touch Is Refused or Accepted in Art: A Comparison of Van Gogh’s The Sunflowers and Maurizio Cattelan’s The Comedian

Authors

  • Ying Wu Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15800876

Keywords:

Materiality of Painting, Artwork as Event, Theatricality, Ephemerality, Tactile Engagement

Abstract

Moments of crisis are always worth analysing. When confronted by visitors’ hands, The Sunflowers and The Comedian represent contrasting attitudes. This divergence is determined by differences in their modes of existence, durations, irreproducibilities, and ways of being experienced. The existence of The Sunflowers depends upon the permanence of its physical substance; however, The Comedian is an ephemeral event, inhering in fluid relationships and forms of interactions. From the former to the latter, artworks have embodied a detachment from their Objecthood and are transforming from products into processes. The spectator’s experience also changes from the pure gaze to corporeal, emotional and behavioural engagement. Traditional museum provides a distanced space, reinforcing the untouchability of artworks by maintaining a separation between the spectator and the work, while The Comedian created an interactive space, where the sense of touch is not only corporeal, but also affective.

References

artnet (2019a) ‘Maurizio Cattelan Is Taping Bananas to a Wall at Art Basel Miami Beach and Selling Them for $120,000 Each’, Artnet News, 4 December. Available at: https://news.artnet.com/market/maurizio-cattelan-banana-art-basel-miami-beach-1722516 (Accessed: 29 December 2024).

artnet (2019b) ‘Maurizio Cattelan’s $120,000 Banana Was Ejected from Art Basel Miami Beach After Drawing Unsafe Crowds (and Getting Eaten)’, Artnet News, 7 December. Available at: https://news.artnet.com/market/cattelan-banana-art-art-basel-1725678 (Accessed: 29 December 2024).

Benjamin, W. (2007) ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, in Arendt, H. (ed.) Illuminations. Essays and Reflections. Translated by H. Zohn. New preface by L. Wieseltier. New York: Schocken Books. Originally published in German as Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit, 1935.

Bennett, T. (2006) ‘Civic Seeing: Museums and the Organization of Vision’, in Macdonald, S. (ed.) A Companion to Museum Studies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 263–281.

Berger, J., Blomberg, S., Fox, C., Dibb, M. and Hollis, R. (1990) Ways of Seeing. Based on the BBC television series. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.

Bourriaud, N. (1998) Esthétique relationnelle. Dijon: Presses du réel.

Candlin, F. (2006) ‘The dubious inheritance of touch: Art history and museum access’, Journal of Visual Culture, 5(2), pp. 137–154.

Chutaux Mila, C. (2021) Esthétique de l’art invisuel. Paris: Les Édition du Panthéon.

Classen, C. (2012) The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Champaig: University of Illinois Presse.

Davies, D. (2003) Art as Performance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Dewey, J. (2005) Art as Experience. New York: Penguin Group.

Esther Schipper (no date) ‘Karin Sander, Blood Orange/Blutorange, 2012’, Esther Schipper. Available at: https://www.estherschipper.com/artists/49-karin-sander/works/17521/ (Accessed: 4 July 2025).

Foucault, M. (2004) La peinture de Manet. Suivi de Michel Foucault, un regard. Paris: Seuil.

Fried, M. (1998) Art and Objecthood, Essays and Reviews. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Gilson, É. (2024) Peinture et réalité. Reprint of 1972 edition. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.

Greenberg, C. (1965) ‘Modernist Painting’, in Ashbery J. (ed.) Art and Literature: an international review, 4, Lausanne: S.E.L.A, pp. 193–201.

Groys, B. (2016) In the flow. London; New York: Verso.

Howes, D. and Classen, C. (2014) Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. First edition. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.

Huhtamo, E. (2006) ‘Twin-Touch-Test-Redux: Media Archeological Approach to Art, Interactivity, and Tactility’, in Grau, O. (ed.) MediaArtHistories. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. pp. 71–101.

Lahire, B. (2020) Ceci n’est pas qu’un tableau. Essai sur l’art, la domination, la magie et le sacré. Second edition. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.

Maurizio Cattelan: Comedian by Francesco Bonami, HENI Talks (2021). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPoODlSIEuM (Accessed 27 December 2024).

Perullo, N. (2022) ‘Haptic Wisdom’, in Iannilli, G.L. (ed.) Co-operative Aesthetics. A Quasi-Manifesto for the 21st Century. Sesto San Giovanni: Aesthetica Edizioni, pp. 99–115.

Rappolt, M., Rakun, F. and Darmawan, A. (2022) ‘Who’s Exploiting Who? ruangrupa on documenta fifteen’, ArtReview, 26 September. Available at: https://artreview.com/who-is-exploiting-who-ruangrupa-on-documenta-fifteen/ (Accessed: 28 december 2024).

Spector N., Bonami, F., Vanderlinden B. and Gioni M. (2003) Maurizio Cattelan. Second edition. London: Phaidon.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

Issue

Section

Symposium. Art, Aesthetics, and the Sense of Touch

How to Cite

When Touch Is Refused or Accepted in Art: A Comparison of Van Gogh’s The Sunflowers and Maurizio Cattelan’s The Comedian. (2025). ESPES The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15800876