A Subtle Aesthetic Touch in the Experience of Art

Authors

  • Marc Jiménez-Rolland Author
  • Mario Gensollen Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15789655

Keywords:

Tactual Art, Inferior Senses, Sensory Hierarchies, Media Specificity, Methods of Inscription, Aesthetic Experience

Abstract

The absence of ‘tactual art’ in Western culture is often associated with a marginalization of the sense of touch in the aesthetic experience of art. This paper considers several explanations for the apparent historical neglect of touch as an aesthetic sense. While dismissing the idea that the relevance of touch for aesthetic engagement with art depends on there being an art of touch, it also explores how tactual experiences might contribute to the  aesthetic appreciation of artworks across a variety of media. It argues that touch plays a crucial role in our engagement with artworks. Ultimately, it aims to enrich aesthetic theory by foregrounding the subtle yet significant influence of touch in art, proposing a broader, more inclusive understanding of sensory engagement in artistic practices.

References

Antunes, L.R. (2016) The Multisensory Film Experience. A Cognitive Model of Experiential Film Aesthetics. Bristol: Intellect.

Aristotle (2001) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Edited by J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Candlin, F. (2004) ‘Don’t Touch! Hands Off! Art, Blindness and the Conservation of Expertise’, Body & Society, 10(1), pp. 71–90.

Candlin, F. (2006) ‘The Dubious Inheritance of Touch: Art History and Museum Access’, Journal of Visual Culture, 5(2), pp. 137–154.

Candlin, F. (2008) ‘Museums, Modernity and the Class Politics of Touching Objects’, in H.J. Chatterjee (ed.) Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling. Oxford: Berg Publishers, pp. 9–20.

Carroll, N. (1985) ‘The Specificity of Media in the Arts’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 19, pp. 5–20.

Classen, C. (2012) The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Descartes, R. (1989) The Passions of the Soul. Translated by S.H. Voss. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Fulkerson, M. (2024) ‘Touch’, in E.N. Zalta and U. Nodelman (eds) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2024. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entriesouch/ (Accessed: 1 July 2025).

Gallace, A. and Spence, Ch. (2011) ‘Tactile Aesthetics: Towards a Definition of its Characteristics and Neural Correlates’, Social Semiotics, 21(4), pp. 569–589.

Hayes, L. and Rajko, J. (2017) ‘Towards an Aesthetics of Touch’, in MOCO '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing, pp. 1–8.

Henderson, J. and Lingle, A. (2023) ‘Touch Decisions: For Heritage Objects’, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, pp. 1–13.

Herder, J.G. (2011) Sculpture. Some Observations on Shape and Form from Pygmalion’s Creative Dream. Translated by J. Gaiger. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Herring, F.W. (1949) ‘The Neglected Sense’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 7(3), pp. 199–215.

Hopkins, R. (2000) ‘Touching Pictures’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 40(1), pp. 149–167.

Hopkins, R. (2004) ‘Painting, Sculpture, Sight, and Touch’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 44(2), pp. 149–166.

Hopkins, R. (2009) ‘The Senses and Art’, in S. Davies, K.M. Higgins, R. Hopkins, R. Stecker and D.E. Cooper (eds.) A Companion to Aesthetics. (2nd ed.). New York: Blackwell, pp. 530–534.

Hopkins, R. (2015) ‘Reproductive Prints as Aesthetic Surrogates’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(1), pp. 11–21.

Jonas, H. (1954) ‘The Nobility of Sight: A Study in the Phenomenology of the Senses’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(4), pp. 507–519.

Kant, I. (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2006) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by R.B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kearney, R. (2020) ‘Philosophies of Touch: From Aristotle to Phenomenology’, Research in Phenomenology, 50(3), pp. 300–316.

Koed, E. (2009) ‘Sculpture’, in S. Davies, K.M. Higgins, R. Hopkins, R. Stecker and D.E. Cooper (eds.) A Companion to Aesthetics. (2nd ed.). New York: Blackwell, pp. 104–106.

Korsmeyer, C. (2019a) ‘A Tour of the Senses’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 59(4), pp. 357–371.

Korsmeyer, C. (2019b) Things: In Touch with the Past. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kovach, F.J. (1970) ‘The Role of the Senses in the Aesthetic Experience’, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 1(3), pp. 91–102.

Lauwrens, J. (2019) ‘Touch as an Aesthetic Experience’, Image & Text, 32, pp. 1–20.

Levinson, J. (2006) Contemplating Art. Essays in Aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lopes, D.M. (1997) ‘Art Media and the Sense Modalities: Tactile Pictures’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 47(189), pp. 425–440.

Lopes, D.M. (2002) ‘Vision, Touch, and the Value of Pictures’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 42(2), pp. 191–201.

Nguyen, C.Thi. (2020) Games. Agency as Art. New York: Oxford University Press.

Plato (1997) Plato: Complete Works. Edited by J.M. Cooper and D.S. Hutchinson. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Read, H. (1956) The Art of Sculpture. The A. W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Sobchack, V.C. (2004) Carnal Thoughts. Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Shiner, L. (2020) Art Scents. Exploring the Aesthetics of Smell and the Olfactory Arts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tatarkiewicz, W. (1980) A History of Six Ideas. An Essay in Aesthetics. Cham: Springer.

Woolgar, C.M. (2006) ‘Problems of Sensory History and the Medieval Laity’, in The Senses in Late Medieval England. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

Issue

Section

Symposium. Art, Aesthetics, and the Sense of Touch

How to Cite

A Subtle Aesthetic Touch in the Experience of Art. (2025). ESPES The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15789655