The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics
Breaking Aesthetic Boundaries: Arthur Danto, Yuriko Saito, and the Challenge to Western Aesthetic Thought
Abstract
This article examines how Arthur C. Danto and Yuriko Saito sought to expand the boundaries of aesthetics and art, challenging the inherited concepts of Western modernity. While Danto redefines art as an intellectual rather than a purely visual phenomenon, ultimately declaring the end of art to justify a pluralistic and self-reflective artistic landscape, Saito reclaims everyday life as a legitimate subject of aesthetic inquiry. Her approach challenges the separation between aesthetics and practice,
demonstrating that aesthetic choices shape our surroundings, social relationships, and ethical commitments. By comparing these two perspectives, this article highlights the limitations of modern aesthetic paradigms, including Danto’s. Furthermore, by examining the reductions imposed by modern aesthetic history, it argues that Saito’s Everyday Aesthetics offers an alternative, transformative, and generative aesthetic framework—one capable of dismantling previous aesthetic barriers and opening
new, underexplored paths for the discipline. More importantly, her approach possesses a profound transformative power, allowing individuals to engage with aesthetics in ways that shape both their perception of the world and their everyday lives.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (English)References
Alcaraz, M.J. (2006) La teoría del arte de Arthur Danto: de los objetos indiscernibles a los significados encarnados. PhD thesis. Universidad de Murcia.
Baumgarten, A.G. (1750) Aesthetica. Frankfurt: Kleyb.
Cascales, R. (2019) Arthur Danto and the End of Art. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Cascales, R. (2022) ‘Vindicating the Historical Condition of Art and Its Consequences: Hegel’s Influence on Danto’s Philosophical System’, Rivista di Estetica, 79(1), pp. 121–
Cascales, R. (2024a) ‘A New Historiographical Path: Recovering Arthur Danto’s Narrative’, Historia da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of
Historiography, 17, pp. 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v17.2187
Cascales, R. (2024b) ‘Simone Weil y la atención a la belleza encarnada’, in Infante, F. and Godoy, M.J. (Eds.) Estéticas perdidas. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia, pp. 387–
Carroll, N. (2021) Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Danto, A.C. (1964) ‘The Artworld’, The Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), pp. 571–584.
Danto, A.C. (1981) The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Danto, A.C. (1992) Beyond the Brillo Box. The Visual Arts in Post-historical Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Danto, A.C. (1996) ‘Art, Essence, History, and Beauty: A Reply to Carrier, a Response to Higgins’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54(3), pp. 284–287.
Danto, A.C. (1999) After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Danto, A.C. (2001) Philosophizing Art: Selected Essays. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Danto, A.C. (2003) The Abuse of Beauty. Aesthetics and the Concept of Art. Illinois: Open Court Publishing.
Danto, A.C. (2013) What Art Is. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dewey, J. (1934) Art as Experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
Dowling, C. (2010) ‘The Aesthetics of Daily Life’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 50(3), pp. 225–242.
Fernández-Gómez, R. (2025) ‘Estética de lo cotidiano y transculturalidad. «Por los caminos de Asia Oriental»’, Anuario Filosófico, 58(1), pp. 121–140.
doi:10.15581/009.58.1.005.
Gilligan, C. (1984) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Godoy, M.J. (2021a) ‘Belleza y moral en Yuriko Saito: una aproximación desde el funcionalismo emotivista de David Hume’, Pensamiento: Revista de Investigación
e Información Filosófica, 296, pp. 787–807.
Godoy, M.J. (2021b) ‘No Tension: David Hume’s Solution to Everyday Aesthetics’, ESPES. The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics, 10(2), pp. 11–24.
Godoy, M.J. (2023) ‘Injusticia epistémica y estética de lo cotidiano’, Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 26(3), pp. 45–61.
Goehr, L. (2013) ‘Remembering Arthur Danto (1924-2013)’, The Brooklyn Rail: Critical Perspectives on Arts, Politics and Culture, 5 November. Available at: https://
brooklynrail.org/2013/11/art/remembering-arthur-danto-1924-2013.
Goehr, L. (2022) Red Sea-Red Square-Red Thread: A Philosophical Detective Story. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, C. (1960) ‘Modernist Painting’, in Frascina, F. and Harrison, C. (eds.) Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 85–93.
Haapala, A. (2005) ‘On the Aesthetics of the Everyday: Familiarity, Strangeness, and the Meaning of Place’, in Light, A. and Smith, J.M. (eds.) The Aesthetics of Everyday Life.
New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 39–55.
Han, B.-C. (2018) Saving Beauty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1835) Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Hume, D. (1757) ‘Of the Standard of Taste’, in Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. London: Longman.
Infante-del-Rosal, F. (2025) ‘Gillo Dorfles, An Everyday Aesthetician’, Anuario Filosófico, 58(1), pp. 99–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15581/009.58.1.004.
Infante-del-Rosal, F. (2018) La autonomía del diseño. Diseño como categoría estética. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
Kant, I. (1790) Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Lagarde und Friedrich.
Leddy, T. (2012a) The Extraordinary in the Ordinary: The Aesthetics of Everyday Life. Broadview Press.
Leddy, T. (2012b) ‘Defending Everyday Aesthetics and the Concept of “Pretty”’, Contemporary Aesthetics, 10. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/
spo.7523862.0010.008.
Lipovetsky, G. and Serroy, J. (2013) L'Esthétisation du Monde: Vivre à l'Âge du Capitalisme Artiste. Paris: Gallimard.
Luque Moya, G. (2019) ‘Los orígenes de la estética de lo cotidiano: John Dewey y la noción de experiencia estética’, Discusiones Filosóficas, 20(35), pp. 129–148.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2019.20.35.8.
Mandoki, K. (2007) Everyday Aesthetics: Prosaics, the Play of Culture and Social Identities. Hampshire: Ashgate.
Melchionne, K. (2011) ‘Aesthetic Experience in Everyday Life: A Reply to Dowling’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 51, pp. 437–442.
Melchionne, K. (2013) ‘The Definition of Everyday Aesthetics’, Contemporary Aesthetics, vol. 11. Available at: https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/
vol11/iss1/26/ (Accessed: 13 March 2025).
Nietzsche, F. (1974) The Gay Science. Translated by W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage. [1882].
Nietzsche, F. (2000) The Birth of Tragedy. Translated by D. Large. Oxford: Oxford University Press [1872].
Pradier, A. (2025) ‘La estética de lo cotidiano y la paradoja de la cotidianidad’, Anuario Filosófico, 58(1), pp. 51–76.
Principe, M.A. (2005) ‘Danto and Baruchello: From Art to the Aesthetics of the Everyday’, in Light, A. and Smith, J.M. (eds.) The Aesthetics of Everyday Life. New
York: Columbia University Press, pp. 56–72.
Saito, Y. (2007) Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saito, Y. (2012) ‘Everyday Aesthetics and World-Making’, Contrastes. Revista de Filosofía, Suplemento 17, pp. 35–54.
Saito, Y. (2017) Aesthetics of the Familiar: Everyday Life and World-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saito, Y. (2020) ‘Aesthetics of Care’, in Somhegyi, Z. and Ryynänen, M. (eds.) Aesthetics in Dialogue: Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 187–
Saito, Y. (2022) Aesthetics of Care: Ethical and Aesthetic Intersections in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Santayana, G. (1896) The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outlines of Aesthetic Theory. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Shusterman, R. (2010) ‘Back to the Future: Aesthetics Today’, The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 43, pp. 104–124.
Shusterman, R. (2012) Thinking through the Body: Essays in Somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shusterman, R. (2013) ‘Everyday Aesthetics of Embodiment’, in Ritu Bhatt (ed.) Rethinking Aesthetics: The Role of Body in Design. New York: Routledge, pp. 13–35.
Weil, S. (2002) Gravity and Grace. Translated by E. Crawford and M. von der Ruhr. New York: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. (2002) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York: Routledge.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ESPES. The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics (ISSN 1339-1119) is published biannually by University of Presov, Slovakia and the Society for Aesthetics in Slovakia. Registration number of the journal in the Register of Periodical Publications of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic: EV173/23/EPP.
This journal is open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.