The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics
Haptic Aesthetics as the Possibility of Haptic Epistemology
Abstract
The denotative and theoretical indeterminacy make the sense of touch an ambiguous concept to work with. While materiality and relationality, traditionally assigned in philosophical discourses and acknowledged through scientific research, are considered as the inherent dimensions of touch, the paper additionally proposes ambiguity as one of its integral traits. The notion of ambiguity, which encapsulates the tension between contrasting notions in both, the conceptualizations of touch as well as the touch-derived phenomenological experiences, is suggested as epistemologically generative, and a vital condition for sensory knowing, especially in aesthetics. This represents the basis for discussing the significance of a non-discursive haptic epistemology in outlining haptic aesthetics and aesthetic experience, which are marked by the necessary openness and inconclusiveness, required for the particular epistemic potential of art.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (English)References
Aristotle. (2011) De Anima. Translated by M. Shiffman. Indianapolis: Focus.
Aumiller, R. (2021) ‘Sensation and Hesitation: Haptic Scepticism as the Ethics of Touching’, in Aumiller, R. (ed.) A Touch of Doubt: On Haptic Scepticism. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 2–29. doi: 10.1515/9783110627176-002
Barker, J. M. (2009) The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Bartalesi, V. (2021) ‘Rethinking contact: the haptic in the viral era’, Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi dell’estetico, 14(1), pp. 23–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-12481
Benjamin, W. (1999) Illuminations. London: Pimlico.
Brincker, M. (2015) ‘The Aesthetic Stance – On the Conditions and Consequences of Becoming a Beholder’, in Scarinzi, A. (ed.) Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind: Beyond Art Theory and the Cartesian Mind-Body Dichotomy. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht, pp. 117–138. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9379-7_8
Bruno, G. (2014) Surface: Matters of Aesthetics, Materiality, and Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ciaunica, A. and Fotopoulou, A. (2017) ‘The Touched Self: Psychological and Philosophical Perspectives on Proximal Intersubjectivity and the Self’, in Durt, C., Fuchs, T. and Tewes, C. (eds.) Embodiment, Enaction, and Culture. Investigating the Constitution of the Shared World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 173–192
Cole, J. and Paillard, J. (1998) ‘Living without Touch and Peripheral Information about Body Position and Movement: Studies with Deafferented Subjects’, in Bermudez, J. (ed.) The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 245–266.
Dalmasso, A. C. (2019) ‘Techno-aesthetic Thinking. Technicity and Symbolism in the Body’, Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi dell’estetico, 12(1), pp. 69–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.13128/Aisthesis-25623
De Vignemont, F. and Massin, O. (2009) ‘Touch’, in Bayne, T., Cleermans, A. and Wilken, P. (eds.), Oxford Companion to Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 633–635.
De Vignemont, F. and Massin, O. (2013) ‘Touch’, in Matthen, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 294-311.
Derrida, J. (2005) On Touching – Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Deleuze, G. (2003) Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. London: Continuum.
Diaconu, M. (2006) ‘Reflections on an Aesthetics of Touch, Smell and Taste’, Contemporary Aesthetics, 4, 8.
Didi-Huberman, G. (2008) La ressemblance par contact. Archéologie, anachronisme et modernité. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Driscoll, R. (2020) The Sensing Body in the Visual Arts: Making and Experiencing Sculpture. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Fisher, J. (1997) ‘Relational sense: Towards a Haptic Aesthetics’, Parachute: Contemporary Arts Magazine, 84, pp. 4–11.
Fisher, J. (2002) ‘Tactile Affects’, Tessera, 32. doi: https://doi.org/10.25071/1923-9408.25273
Fulkerson, M. (2013) The First Sense: A Philosophical Study of Human Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gallace, A., and Spence, C. (2011) ‘Tactile Aesthetics: Towards a Definition of its Characteristics and Neural Correlates, Social Semiotics, 21(4), pp. 569–589. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2011.591998
Gregor, M. J. (1983) ‘Baumgarten’s “Aesthetica”’, The Review of Metaphysics, 37 (2), pp. 357–385.
Heller-Roazen, D. (2007) The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Husserl, E. (1989) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kambaskovic, D. and Wolfe, C. T. (2014) ‘The Senses in Philosophy and Science: From the Nobility of Sight to the Materialism of Touch’, in Roodenburg, H. (ed.) A Cultural History of the Senses in the Renaissance. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 107–125.
Kolenc, B. (2019) ‘The Category of the (Un) Touchable in Haptic Materialism: Touch, Repetition, and Language’, Komel, M. (ed.) The Language of Touch: Philosophical Examinations in Linguistics and Haptic Studies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 91–106.
Komel, M. (2016) ‘A Touchy Subject: The Tactile Metaphor of Touch’, Družboslovne razprave, 32(82), pp. 115-125.
Marks, L. U. (2014) ‘Haptic Aesthetics’, in Kelly, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–274.
Mersch, D. (2015) Epistemologies of aesthetics. Zurich-Berlin: Diaphanes.
Mersch, D. (2017a) ‘Art, Knowledge, and Reflexivity’, Artnodes: revista de arte, ciencia y tecnología, 20, pp. 33–38. doi: 10.7238/a.v0i20.3152
Mersch, D. (2017b) Art and Non-propositional Thinking. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/40780325/Art_and_Non_Propositional_Thinking (Accessed: 11 March 2025)
Nancy, J. L. (2008) Corpus. New York: Fordham University Press.
Nancy, J. L. (2009) Noli me tangere: On the Raising of the Body. New York: Fordham University Press.
Pallasmaa, J. (2012) The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Paterson, M. (2007) The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Oxford: Berg.
Puig de La Bellacasa, M. (2009) ‘Touching Technologies, Touching Visions. The Reclaiming of Sensorial Experience and the Politics of Speculative Thinking’, Subjectivity, 28, pp. 297–315. doi: 10.1057/sub.2009.17
Ratcliffe, M. (2012) ‘What is touch?’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90(3), pp. 413–432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2011.598173
Riegl, A. (1985) Late Roman Art Industry. Rome: Giorgio Bretschneider Editore.
Švankmajer, J. (2014) Touching and Imagining: An Introduction to Tactile Art. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Vichnar, D. and Armand, L. (2017) ‘Aisthēsis’, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-104 (Accessed: 11 March 2025)
Wallenstein, S. O. (2013) ‘Baumgarten and the Invention of Aesthetics’, Site, 33, pp. 31–57.
Wyschogrod, E. (1980) ‘Doing Before Hearing: On the Primacy of Touch’, in Laruelle, F. (ed.), Textes pour Emmanuel Levinas. Paris: Jean Laplace, pp. 179–203.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ESPES. The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics (ISSN 1339-1119) is published biannually by University of Presov, Slovakia and the Society for Aesthetics in Slovakia. Registration number of the journal in the Register of Periodical Publications of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic: EV173/23/EPP.
This journal is open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.