A Subtle Aesthetic Touch in the Experience of Art

Marc Jiménez-Rolland, Mario Gensollen

Abstract


The absence of ‘tactual art’ in Western culture is often associated with a marginalization of the sense of touch in the aesthetic experience of art. This paper considers several explanations for the apparent historical neglect of touch as an aesthetic sense. While dismissing the idea that the relevance of touch for aesthetic engagement with art depends on there being an art of touch, it also explores how tactual experiences might contribute to the aesthetic appreciation of artworks across a variety of media. It argues that touch plays a crucial role in our engagement with artworks. Ultimately, it aims to enrich aesthetic theory by foregrounding the subtle yet significant influence of touch in art, proposing a broader, more inclusive understanding of sensory engagement in artistic practices.


Keywords


tactual art; inferior senses; sensory hierarchies; media specificity; methods of inscription; aesthetic experience

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References


Aristotle. (2001). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. J. Barnes (ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Candlin, Fiona. (2004). ‘Don’t Touch! Hands Off! Art, Blindness and the Conservation of Expertise’, Body & Society, 10(1), pp. 71-90.

Candlin, Fiona. (2006). ‘The Dubious Inheritance of Touch: Art History and Museum Access’, Journal of Visual Culture, 5(2), pp. 137-154.

Candlin, Fiona. (2008). ‘Museums, Modernity and the Class Politics of Touching Objects’. In H. J. Chatterjee (ed.). Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling. Oxford: Berg Publishers, pp. 9-20.

Carroll, Nöel. (1985). ‘The Specificity of Media in the Arts’, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 19, pp. 5-20.

Classen, Constance. (2012). The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Descartes, René. (1989). The Passions of the Soul (S. H. Voss, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

Fulkerson, Matthew. (2024). ‘Touch’. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = .

Gallace, Alberto & Spence, Charles. (2011). ‘Tactile Aesthetics: Towards a Definition of its Characteristics and Neural Correlates’, Social Semiotics, 21(4), pp. 569-589.

Hayes, Lauren & Rajko, Jessica. (2017). ‘Towards an Aesthetics of Touch’. In MOCO '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing, pp. 1-8.

Henderson, Jane & Lingle, Ashley (2023). ‘Touch Decisions: For Heritage Objects’, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, pp. 1-13.

Herder, Johann Gottfried. (2011). Sculpture. Some Observations on Shape and Form from Pygmalion’s Creative Dream. (Jason Gaiger, Trans.). Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Herring, Frances W. (1949). ‘The Neglected Sense’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 7(3), pp. 199-215.

Hopkins, Robert. (2000). ‘Touching Pictures’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 40(1), pp. 149-167.

Hopkins, Robert. (2004). ‘Painting, Sculpture, Sight, and Touch’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 44(2), pp. 149-166.

Hopkins, Robert. (2009). ‘The Senses and Art’. In S. Davies, K.M. Higgins, R. Hopkins, R. Stecker, & D.E. Cooper (eds.). A Companion to Aesthetics. (2nd ed.). New York: Blackwell, pp. 530-534.

Hopkins, Robert. (2015). ‘Reproductive Prints as Aesthetic Surrogates’ The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(1), pp. 11-21.

Jonas, Hans. (1954). ‘The Nobility of Sight: A Study in the Phenomenology of the Senses’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(4), pp. 507-519.

Kant, Immanuel. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, Immanuel. (2006). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (R. B. Louden, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kearney, Richard. (2020). ‘Philosophies of Touch: From Aristotle to Phenomenology’. Research in Phenomenology, 50(3), pp. 300-316.

Koed, Erik. (2009). ‘Sculpture’. In In S. Davies, K.M. Higgins, R. Hopkins, R. Stecker & D.E. Cooper (eds.). A Companion to Aesthetics. (2nd ed.). New York: Blackwell, pp. 104-106.

Korsmeyer, Carolyn. (2019). ‘A Tour of the Senses’. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 59(4), pp. 357-371.

Kovach, Francis J. (1970). ‘The Role of the Senses in the Aesthetic Experience’. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 1 (3), pp. 91-102.

Lauwrens, Jenni. (2019). ‘Touch as an Aesthetic Experience’, Image & Text, 32, pp. 1-20.

Levinson, Jerrold. (2006). Contemplating Art. Essays in Aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lopes, Dominic M. McIver. (1997). ‘Art Media and the Sense Modalities: Tactile Pictures’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 47(189), pp. 425-440.

Lopes, Dominic M. McIver. (2002). ‘Vision, Touch, and the Value of Pictures’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 42(2), pp. 191-201.

Nguyen, C. Thi. (2020). Games. Agency as Art. New York: Oxford University Press.

Plato. (1997). Plato: Complete Works. J. M. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson (eds.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

Read, Herbert. (1956). The Art of Sculpture. The A. W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. (1980). A History of Six Ideas. An Essay in Aesthetics. Cham: Springer.

Woolgar, C. M. (2006). ‘Problems of Sensory History and the Medieval Laity’. In The Senses in Late Medieval England. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1-15.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

           

 

ESPES. The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics (ISSN 1339-1119) is published biannually by University of Presov, Slovakia and the Society for Aesthetics in Slovakia. Registration number of the journal in the Register of Periodical Publications of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic: EV173/23/EPP.

   This journal is open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.