The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics
Review of Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance
Abstract
Full Text:
PDF (English)References
Abram, D. (2021) ‘Scent and Seduction’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 169–181.
Barré, S. (2021) ‘Women’s Smell’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 157–168.
Barwich, A.-S. (2019) ‘A critique of olfactory objects’, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, p. 1337. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01337.
Croijmans, I. and Majid, A. (2016) ‘Not all flavor expertise is equal: The language of wine and coffee experts’, PLoS One, 11(6), p. E0155845.
Deroy, O., Crisinel, A. S. and Spence, C. (2013) ‘Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, pp. 878–896.
De Valk, J. M., Wnuk, E., Huisman, J. L. and Majid, A. (2017) ‘Odor–color associations differ with verbal descriptors for odors: A comparison of three linguistically diverse groups’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, pp. 1171–1179.
Di Stefano, N., Murari, M. and Spence, C. (2021) ‘Crossmodal correspondences in art and science: Odours, poetry, and music’, in Olfaction: An interdisciplinary perspective from philosophy to life sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 155– 189.
Drobnick, J. (2021) ‘Olfactivism’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 76–98.
Edreva, E. (2021) ‘Olfactory Resistance at the End of the World’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 56–64.
French, L. (2021) ‘Olfaction as Radical Collaboration’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 108– 118.
Gerspacher, A. (2021) ‘Enteric Aesthetics’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 223–234.
Goeltzenleuchter, B. (2021) ‘The Olfactory Counter-monument’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 182–194.
Halperin, J. U. (1988) Félix Fénéon: Aesthete and anarchist in fin-de-siècle Paris. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Herz, R. S. and von Clef, J. (2001) ‘The influence of verbal labeling on the perception of odors: evidence for olfactory illusions?’, Perception, 30(3), pp. 381-391.
Hsu, H. L. (2021) ‘Olfactory Politics in Black Diasporic Art’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) (2021) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 10–21.
King, D. (2021) ‘Is There Empathy through Breathing?’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 99– 107.
Kjellmer, V. (2021) ‘Scented Bodies’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 146–156.
Lynch, A. (2021) ‘Malodors and Miasmas’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 210–222.
Lynn, G. A. (2021) ‘The Political Potential of Smoke’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 44– 55.
Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) (2021) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge.
Mannigel, L. (2021) ‘Shaking Off Disinterested Contemplation’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 195–209.
McGann, J. P. (2017) ‘Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth’, Science, 356(6338), eaam7263.
Millar, B. (2019) ‘Smelling objects’, Synthese, 196, pp. 4279–4303. doi: 10.1007/s11229-017-1657-8.
Morris, M. (2021) ‘Eat Your Makeup’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 131–145.
Muller, C. (2021) ‘Eco-olfactory Art’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 65–75.
Ngamcharoen, P. (2021) ‘Common Scents, a Social Sense of Smell’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 32–43.
Olofsson, J. K. and Gottfried, J. A. (2015) ‘The muted sense: Neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), pp. 314-321.
Riley Parr, D. (2021) ‘Perfumes, Shea Butter, and Black Soap’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 22–31.
Roinard, P., de Labrély, F., Champagne, L. and Deák, N. J. (1976) ‘The song of songs of Solomon’, TDR, 20(3), pp. 130-135.
Rosen, D. (2021) ‘Chrysanthemum Powder and Other Interspecies Scent Rituals’, in Lynn, G. A. and Parr, D. (eds) Olfactory Art and the Political in an Age of Resistance. New York: Routledge, pp. 119–130.
Spence, C. (2011) ‘Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review’, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, pp. 971-995.
Spence, C. and Di Stefano, N. (2022) ‘Crossmodal harmony: looking for the meaning of harmony beyond hearing’, i-Perception, 13(1), p. 20416695211073817.
Stokes, J. (1972) Resistible theatres: Enterprise and experiment in the late nineteenth century. London: Paul Elek Books.
Yeshurun, Y. and Sobel, N. (2010) ‘An odor is not worth a thousand words: from multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects’, Annual Review of Psychology, 61, pp. 219-241.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ESPES. The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics (ISSN 1339-1119) is published biannually by University of Presov, Slovakia and the Society for Aesthetics in Slovakia. Registration number of the journal in the Register of Periodical Publications of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic: EV173/23/EPP.
This journal is open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.